The
        teleportation of Neil Webb
        
        In “Art as Far as the eye can see”
        ,
        Paul Virillo uses the term ‘Dromoscopy’ to
        describe the illusion that when travelling quickly, by car
        for example, the driver experiences the sensation that it
        is in fact the world which is receding rather than the car
        speeding through space.
        
        One of the defining aspects of the dromoscopic sensation
        would be the positioning of the subject at the stable
        centre of fast appearing, (and fast disappearing), reality.
        At its most intense and self-obsessed, there could be
        something Canute–like about it, a refusal to accept
        one’s limits in respect of natural phenomena, but in
        lesser degrees it serves as an appropriate metaphor for a
        familiar subjective/objective experience in negotiating
        time and space.
        
        Neil Webb uses metaphors of movement when describing his
        work and he has described this most recent piece at Bloc
        Space as ‘a kind of cosmic travel’. Instead of
        the scopic, the principle sense here is aural, but like
        Virillo’s dromoscopic driver, there is still a sense
        of movement and it is towards interiority and stillness. To
        some extent there is an acknowledgement of the speed and
        facts of an external corporeal world, but there is also
        withdrawal; it is part fantasy, but is also part pure
        presence.
        
        This installation sets out its stall to produce affects, by
        effects, and, I would guess, to be measured by them. If the
        work engages (if it knocks you out), its good, if it
        doesn’t, it fails. Its success may be judged on if,
        or indeed, where it transports the ‘viewer’.
        
        Three large, pristine, gloss-black, spray-painted aluminium
        panels, hang on three of the walls of Bloc Space. Described
        by Webb as ‘voids’ they reference the monoliths
        of Kubrick’s “2001”, but these are souped
        up and fully loaded. There is a nod, deliberate or
        otherwise, to Rothko, in an acknowledgment of the
        chapel-like dimensions of Bloc space. There is also an
        attempt to make the shiny panels appear to hover by the use
        of U/V back light but it’s never quite clear how
        effective this lighting is. Unlike Rothko’s
        dematerialisations, Webb’s panels are still, cold and
        hard facts.
        
        These panels are also the source, if that’s the right
        word, of a great deal of sound. They are in fact the
        unconventional ‘speakers’ of a sound
        installation but are more ‘metal’ than quiet
        contemplation. In fact, to think of them as speakers is
        slightly misleading. They utilise a process of vibration
        via technology developed by Webb, which he originally used
        to turn large plate glass windows into amplifying devices.
        They are speakers, but not as we know them. Against the
        fourth wall a seating bench doubles as a bass bin from
        which deep sound rises up through the body.
        
        The sound is loud, very
        loud,
        and it fills the space with something unfocussed, lush and
        ambiguous. It is mostly electronic, spatial, sweeping and
        filmic. At over 45 mins in length there is a coy promise of
        a climax, some kind of an accretion and narrative in the
        work. The teleology of some distant point plays upon the
        codes and quotes set within it. Through the use of the
        sound of a mellotron and the mediated sound-clips from
        ‘2010’ there is a summoning of filmic tropes of
        space travel, cosmic distances, and outer limits.
        
        There is more than hint of nostalgia here; this is
        nostalgia as a melancholic response to a loss of feeling.
        It is feeling the loss of feeling amounting to emptiness in
        the place where those feelings used to be. The fallible
        gorgeousness, pure fakery and past-glories of the sounds of
        the mellotron make perfect sense.
        
        Like much Sci-fi, despite its futuristic metaphors,
        Webb’s work is a journey into the past. This is
        nostalgia for the possibility of a future long since gone,
        an imagined future of the 1970’s and 80’s.
        It’s strange that the sounds of the future seem so
        dated and outmoded, like science fiction is something over.
        When did we move away from a future potential, when did the
        future become so enmeshed with the present?
        
        The thing of the future is a thing of the past.
        
        Ultimately, this is more Dark
        Star than
        2001;
        it trips you up to remind you that despite all the fakery
        there is no loss of effect. In fact, fakery
        is
        the
        effect. Significantly, in the midst of the nostalgia and
        oceanic soundscape it is easy to miss the work’s
        delicate immediacy. At the same time as the work toys with
        references to a future that never was, it also vibrates and
        creates real time ‘accidental’ blips, squeaks,
        harmonics, vibrations, pulses and sound waves in the
        present tense, creating a new performance at every turn.
        These are the product of the relationship between the
        sounds, the panels, the space, the representations and the
        body and are wholly unpredictable yet artfully exploited.
        For me, the work really starts to take place where the
        sound, imagination and body confront each other. It is here
        that the work really begins its act of transportation.
        
        The trembling and harmonics, which rise up out of the more
        musically orchestrated passages, confirm the here and now,
        and despite their relative quietness, it is these noises
        and blips, which create the sense of interior movement. It
        seems almost in spite of the cosmic aspirations of the
        installation that something is able to take place.
        
        Like resting one’s head against a train window,
        feeling the slight vibration on the forehead, watching a
        mark on the window bounce up and down on the telephone
        wire, the day-dream is rooted in the succession of such
        seemingly banal moments unfettered by any magnitude or
        distance of the journey itself.
        
        When Webb suggests that the work is about some kind of
        travel, cosmic, interior or otherwise, he is right, but
        more precisely, where we are taken to is limbo, where the
        primary product of the work is an ambiguous elsewhere of
        pure technological effect and where the work’s drive
        towards an end point is ultimately held in total suspension
        by a heightened awareness of the present.
        
        Steve Dutton 2007
        
        Steve is professor of Contemporary Art Practice at the
        University of Lincoln.
        
        For further information please visit Steve's website and
        blog
        
steve-dutton.co.uk
        duttsville.blogspot.co.uk 
        Art
        as far as the eye can see.
        Paul Virillo. Published by Berg. 2007. P.20. ISBN
        978-1-84520-611-6
See John Gray’s
        Black
        Mass for a
        brilliant account of utopian ideology driving apocolyptical
        thought. Published by Allen Lane. 2007. ISBN
        978-0-713-99915-0
        
        This article was commissioned by Bloc Projects
        
http://blocprojects.co.uk/discourse/dutton-on-webb/